Gallery — Recent

This set of LaTeX code (mainly nusthesis.cls) composes a template of NUS thesis, which is compliant with the university's requirement. Using this template to organize your thesis content can save a lot of effort spent on formatting. Your edit should start with main.tex, which is also the compilation entry. Sources of individual chapters as well as abstract, acknowledgments, appendices, etc., are placed in the chapters folder. Illustrative figures and analytical plottings should be stored in the pic and exp folders respectively. Please refer to the GitHub repository for more details as well as timely updates.

Tez şablonu

(most of the) remarks go to the original author. Thank you! :) University Assignment Title Page This template has been downloaded from: http://www.LaTeXTemplates.com Original author: WikiBooks

Matta Aditya Reddy's Résumé. Created with the Medium Length CV template.

Our solution for MCM2015

Customizações do abnTeX2 para o Instituto Federal de Minas Gerais - Campus Avançado Arcos

Es un modelo de examen parcial. Incluye las librerías que se usan más comunmente, y algunos ambientes diseñados especialmente para generar parciales de una manera organizada. Se usa actualmente en la UJTL.

Real Analysis Workshop 2 1.3.10

In this paper we develop an original approach to evaluate the costs and benefits associated to a generic promotion program using an application to Bordeaux wines. The benefit is computed from the marginal impact of the collective reputation of the program on the individual reputation of its members. These different marginal impacts are estimated using detailed survey data about the image of Bordeaux wines in seven European countries. We find positive and significant spillover effects from the umbrella reputation (Bordeaux) that moreover increase with the individual reputation level of the wine. Controlling for the natural endogeneity of the collective reputation in this setup, we capture the important fact that this relationship is faced with marginal diminishing returns. These spillover effects, when significantly positive, vary from a minimum of 5% to a maximum of 15% of additional favorable quality opinions. We then show that some subregions are more likely to benefit from generic promotion programs, suggesting that fees should be established on a benefit-cost basis.